By examining the social psychological interactions
between humans and dogs; we discover our energy driven connection to be extremely complex and even mysterious; for it entails mutual cooperation between two participating
species.
In the first study, The Human
Attachment to Dogs (2009), we will consider comparative cognitive studies of visual cognitive ability (VCA) and social cognitive ability (SCA) between humans and dogs. In the second study, the Psychological Effects of Dog Ownership, by the researcher, Krista
Marie Clark Cline (2010) utilizes statistical data on individuals who are
actively engaged in dog ownership. We
will examine correlations between individual wellness such as; stress,
depression, physical activity and exercise with daily stress factors of
multi-tasking, exposing evidence of burdensome psychological effects of dog
ownership on people. We will also
clarify questions of how dog ownership impacts the individual versus an
existing family system in today’s active and highly complex human society.
According to the
first study, Attachment between Humans
and Dogs, by Nagasawa, et al. (2009), over twenty different species of
animals have been successfully domesticated since pre-historic times. Archaeologists have evidence which implies the
dog is one of the most pre-historic mammal species to develop the capacity to
inherently function within human society in comparison to other pre-historic
animal species such as wolves and apes.
The most common purpose of why dog ownership is so widely accepted are
mainly for hunting, guarding and herding (Coppinger- Schnieder 1995). However, human-dog interaction was more closely
examined by Boris Levinson (1962) when he documented a clinical case study
where a child with communication problems tremendously benefited from his
companionship with a dog.
In society, dogs have established themselves a niche
as mans’ best friend. This role ascribes
a standard for which we set the dog species apart from other animal species on
the planet. Dogs seem to possess an
intelligence to understand and respond to human finger pointing and basic hand
gestures on command. This unique
behavior is associated only to dogs, especially the working breeds. Researchers refer to this capacity as visual cognitive ability (VCA). The
theory implies that dogs developed VCA during their domestication period (Hare,
et al., 2002), (Miklosi et al., 2003).
Examining the human-canine connection denotes a canine capacity for
engaging in humanlike VCA similar to
how man’s visual attention can be directed or lead (Call, et al., 2003,
Miklosi, et al., 2000). Also, the study
demonstrates how dogs will not receive food from persons’ whose face is
blindfolded or covered over with a bag (Gasci, et al., 2004; Viranyi, et al.,
2004), (Viranyi, et al., 2006) suggesting dogs can only know what they can see
(canine olfactory and auditory sensory
abilities were not considered in this study). Researchers also indicate a cognitive mental
process and an action directed response linking a specific dog to a specific
human being (Ludwig et al., 1994), (Kikusui et al., 2006), (Adachi, et al.,
2007). This fascinating phenomenon of
dogs utilizing the gaze to commune is
indicative of a higher social cognitive
ability (SCA) as well, which is most essential when understanding the
social psychological cooperation necessary between man and beast (Baron-Cohen,
et al., 1997), (Driver et al., 1999), (Macrae, et al.,2002), (Morton-Johnson,
1991).
In the second study, the Psychological Effects of Dog Ownership, the researcher, Krista
Marie Clark Cline (2010) utilizes statistical data from individual dog owners
engaged in multiple roles, such as physical activity, marital status, age and gender. The basis for this study is to make the
argument that dog ownership can either increase or decrease depression
depending on circumstances in which individuals or families own a dog. The three methods for this study included participants, procedures and measures.
The first method utilized random phone participation where a national
telephone survey, known as random digital
dialing (RDD) was used (Ham & Epping 2006). The survey included 200 questions on various
topics such as; health and medical, social topics, and the environment. A total of 201 adults between the ages of 19
to 94 years responded with interviews lasting 45 to 60 minutes long. The procedure used ordinary least squares (OLS) regression which is a two-step
analysis considering the main effects of dog ownership, including
social support and physical activity.
The second step, regression
examined the effects of moderating variables like, marital
status, age and sex. This study compiled
information to create terms of interaction for ownership by sex, age and
marital status; then acquired dependent
variable statistics (DVS), such as depression, marital status and physical
activity (Ross, et al. 1984). The
research also included independent,
mediating, and moderating variables to integrate owner support roles such
as; friends and family (1- 4), physical exercise (0 - 5), age by (years), male
owner (0) or female owner (1), married (1) Single (0) which included widowed,
divorced, separated or never married.
Current employment (1), unemployed (0) and children under 18 years of
age living at home (1), no children (0) were added variables researchers
considered in measuring role strain for adults.
And finally, the control variables for race and education where used to
measure socioeconomic status (SES) such as, race (white - 1) used as a binary
variable. Education was measured from (1
- 7), less than ninth grade (1), graduate / professional degree (7).
In
conclusion, the study revealed single individuals and women more suitable for
dog ownership than men. The study
denoted well-being beneficial to single persons more so than for married
couples due to primary relationship roles versus an enhanced lifestyle change
where physical activities were priority.
The study also found women who own dogs suffer less from depression than
men, because I know statistically speaking, women are treated for depression
more often than men which clarify theories on gender differences among personal
relationships (Riseman 1998). But dog ownership does
play an effective role on depression regardless of social support from
friends and family or physical activity and exercise. Generally, dog ownership has positive effects on
the individuals overall health and wellness (Ory, et al., 1983; Lawton, et al.,
1984). Employment, married couples,
single individuals and children living at home were added conditions when
examining variables in the research. In
conclusion, the study regarded seasonal timing essential when assuming dog
ownership status. In addition, personal
well-being and depression reduction were factored in for individuals and
families when considering added stress factors and dog ownership. According to statistics, dog ownership is
currently at 46.3 percent for families who own at least one dog (APPMA, 2011-2012). This number is up more than 7 percent from
2006 which is an all-time high.